Penerapan Cooperative Learning Tipe Think Pair Share untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Keterlibatan Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika
Abstract
The Cooperative Learning model of Think Pair Share type to improve learning outcomes and student engagement in learning mathematics at Dharma Mulya Christian High School Surabaya. The subjects of this study were 20 students consisting of 11 female students and 9 male students. This research uses the Kemmis and McTaggart method through 2 cycles. Initial data showed that none of the students' involvement was located at the High level, there was 1 student at the Moderate level, 12 students at the Low level and there were 7 students at the Very Low level. From the written test to determine the learning outcomes of 20 students, only 4 students scored above the KKM, there were 16 students who did not meet the KKM or 80% of students' scores did not meet the specified standards. The final results of Cycle 1 and Cycle 2 for student engagement there was no one in the Very Low category, there were 2 students in the Low category, the Moderate category increased, namely there were 15 students, and the High category had 3 students. Likewise, for student learning outcomes at the end of cycles 1 and 2, 17 students reached the KKM or the percentage reached 85%, so that the research has reached the success indicator. This study found that the application of Cooperative Learning type Think Pair Share can improve learning outcomes and student involvement in learning mathematics.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anthony Jnr., B., Abdul Majid, M., & Romli, A. 2019. Emerging case oriented agents for sustaining educational institutions going green towards environmental responsibility. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 21(2), 186–214.
Englund, L., Moosvi, F., & Roll, I. 2023. Interface and interaction design for an online, asynchronous peer instruction tool. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(5), 2809–2829.
Gioiosa, M. E., & Kinkela, K. 2022. Assessing the outcomes of an active learning exercise. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(4), 1496–1508.
Hetika, H., Farida, I., & Sari, Y. P. 2018. Think Pair Share (TPS) as Method to Improve Student’s Learning Motivation and Learning Achievement. Dinamika Pendidikan, 12(2), 125–135.
Kompella, L. 2024. Service innovations, value-driven business model, and institute growth: insights from a higher-education institute. International Journal of Educational Management.
Letch, N. 2012. Using reflective journals to engage students in learning business process management concepts. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 435–454.
Luthra, A., Dixit, S., & Arya, V. 2024. Evaluating the impact of faculty development on employee engagement practices in higher education: analysing the mediating role of professional development. The Learning Organization, 31(4), 565–584.
Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R. 2000, Participatory Action Research. In: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S., Eds., Handbook of Qualitative Research, SAGE Publications Ltd., London.
McDonald, D., Iscaro, V., & Posey, O. G. 2022. Active learning strategies in business education: using the law to build critical workforce skills. Journal of International Education in Business, 15(2), 406–424.
Musah, A., Aawaar, G., & Nkansah, E. 2024. Role of institutional quality in the public education financing–educational quality nexus: evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Economics and Development.
Okeke, A. U., & Dikeocha, L. U. 2024. Effect of Jigsaw Teaching Approach on Students’ Academic Achievement in Business Education Practicum. Journal of Pedagogy and Education Science, 3(01), 30–41
Oliso, Z. Z., Alemu, D. D., & Jansen, J. D. 2024. The impact of educational service quality on student academic performance in Ethiopian public universities: a mediating role of students’ satisfaction. Journal of International Education in Business, 17(2), 340–370.
Pilato, V., & Voss, H. 2024. A systems thinking approach to international business education. Critical Perspectives on International Business.
Prahl, K. 2017. Best Practices for the Think-Pair-Share Active-Learning Technique. The American Biology Teacher, 79(1), 3–8.
Raba, A. A. A. 2017. The Influence of Think-Pair-Share (TPS) on Improving Students’ Oral Communication Skills in EFL Classrooms. Creative Education, 8(1), 12–23.
Ramírez-Montoya, M.-S., & Portuguez-Castro, M. 2024. Expanding horizons for the future with an open educational model for complex thinking: external and internal validation. On the Horizon: The International Journal of Learning Futures, 32(1), 32–48.
Rieg, D. L., Lima, R. M. M., Mesquita, D., Scramim, F. C. L., & Mattasoglio Neto, O. 2022. Active learning strategies to develop research competences in engineering education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(3), 1210–1223.
Riley, J., & Ward, K. 2017. Active Learning, Cooperative Active Learning, and Passive Learning Methods in an Accounting Information Systems Course. Issues in Accounting Education, 32(2), 1–16.
Savolainen, R. 2019. Seeking and sharing information dialogically. Journal of Documentation, 75(3), 530–549.
Sangadji, E. M. dan Sopiah. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: C.V Andi.
Shaked, H. 2022. The contribution of case-based learning to adopting a multidimensional view in educational leadership students. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(2), 194–205.
Willis, R., & Ameen, N. 2018. An Analysis of the Moderating Effect of Age on Smartphone Adoption and Use in the United Arab Emirates. UK Academy for Information Systems Conference Proceedings, 2017, 1–27.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v25i1.5552
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
|