Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Oknum Partai Politik dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidananya

Padlan Zamzimi

Abstract


This research aims to determine the criminal responsibility of political parties for criminal acts of corruption. The research method used is normative juridical. The results of the research reveal that the criminal responsibility of political party individuals for criminal acts of corruption is Article 20 Paragraph (l) and (2) of Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. Penalties that can be imposed on individuals from political parties who are proven to have legally committed criminal acts of corruption, if the political party is considered a corporation and it can be proven that there is a flow of funds into the political party's coffers through the Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (FTRAC). Dissolution of political parties as an additional form of punishment can be carried out. Regarding the authority of two judicial institutions to dissolve political parties, the two judicial institutions can do the same thing for different reasons or other options, namely the division of authority where the criminal justice system is only a recommendation considering that the penalty for freezing or dissolving a corporation is only an additional penalty, whereas freezing or dissolving remains the authority of the Constitutional Court.


Keywords


Corruption, Political Parties, criminal liability

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amiruddin & Zainal Asikin, 2012, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Raja Grafindo Persada Jakarta

Farouk Muhammad & H. Djaali, 2003, Metodologi Penelitian Sosial (Bunga Rampai), Penerbit PTIK Press, Jakarta

Kristian, 2023, Pertanggugjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 44(4), 585-586

Mahrus Ali, 2016, Hukum Pidana Korupsi, UII Press, Yogyakarta

Mochtar Lubis & James C. Scott, 1995, Bunga Rampai Korupsi, Cetakan Ke-3, LP3ES, Jakarta

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Tata Cara Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana oleh Korporasi.

Rianto Adi, 2004, Metode Penelitian Sosial dan Hukum, PT Grafika, Jakarta

Roeslan Saleh, 1982 Pikiran-pikiran tentang Pertanggungan Jawaban Pidana, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta

Sjahdeni, S. R., 2006, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Grafiti Press, Jakarta

Soeryono Soekarto, 1984, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, UI Press, Jakarta

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamuji, 2004, Penelitian Hukum Normatif ‘Suatu Tinjauan Singkat’, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta

Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, 2006, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Grafiti Press, Jakarta

Tholib Setiady, 2010, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Penitensier Indonesia, Alfabeta, Bandung

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2008 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2011 tentang Partai Politik

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang

Wijaya, E. H., 2008, Peradilan Korupsi Teori dan Praktik, Maharini Press, Jakarta

Zulkifli Aspan dan Wiwin Suwandi, Menjerat Kader, Melepas Partai Politik; Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Partai Politik Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Al-Adalah : Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Islam, Vol. 5 No. 1, 2020, halaman 70-91




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v25i1.6065

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ADRESS JOURNAL

JURNAL ILMIAH UNIVERSITAS BATANGHARI JAMBI (JIUBJ)
Published by Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat
Adress: Jl.Slamet Ryadi, Broni-Jambi, Kec.Telanaipura, Kodepos: 36122, email: jiubj.unbari@gmail.com, Phone: 0741-670700

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.