Peran Kapital Sosial dan Kapital Digital pada Produksi dan Pemasaran Urban Farming dalam Peningkatan Pendapatan Petani Urban Miskin Di Banjir Kanal Timur Kelurahan Pondok Kopi Jakarta Timur
Abstract
Income is one of the indicators of people's welfare, this also applies to urban farmers. Urban farmers are people who work to maintain plants for their benefits to generate income in urban or urban areas. In previous studies, social capital was considered to be effective in increasing production and marketing, which of course had an impact on farmers' income levels. Likewise with technology, it is undeniable that technology has an important role in the sustainability of activities. This article aims to analyze the existence of the role of social capital and digital capital, as well as the obstacles faced by urban farmers in the East Flood Canal, Pondok Kopi sub-district in developing social capital and digital capital, especially in the production and marketing of urban farming to increase the income of urban farmers in BKT by qualitative descriptive approach. Interviews were conducted with 10 informants using a tap recorder, a notebook to write research findings and documentation in the form of photos while at the research location. The selection of informants was carried out by purposive sampling. The results showed that Social Capital is very important in launching production and marketing activities. Trust, networks, values and norms which are elements of social capital are important elements among urban farmers. The form of trust among urban farmers is by lending each other equipment such as hoes and sickles. A social network between farmers and sellers of fertilizers and seeds in the Cakung market who need each other. Values and norms for each farmer not to interfere with each other's land so as to create smoothness in producing agricultural products. Meanwhile, in operating technological devices, in this case, HP as an element of Digital Capital is very minimal. There are still few urban farmers who use Handphones for marketing activities because they cannot read and write, so farmers find it difficult. However, there are some farmers who already use handphones and find it helpful because they can easily get farming tools at the online shop and get more income compared to farmers who do not use handphones in their marketing.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afifah, Nur. 2018. Bertani di Perkotaan Mulai Banyak Dilakukan di Indonesia. Dipetik pada tanggal 29 November 2021, dari www.tempo.co: https://www.tempo.co/abc/2938/bertani-di-perkotaan-mulai-banyak-dilakukan-di-indonesia.
Agusyanto, Ruddy. 2014. Jaringan Sosial Dalam Organisasi. Jakarta, Rajawali Pers
Badan Pusat Statistik. 2019. Statistik Nilai Tukar Petani 2018. Badan Pusat Statistik. Jakarta.
Barnes, J. A. 1969. Social Network in urban Situation: Analysis of Personal Relationship in Central Africa Town. Manchester: University of Manchester Press.
Chambers, Robert. 1996. Memahami desa secara partisipatif. Yogyakarta, Kanisius.
Dewan, S. and Riggins, F.J., 2005. The digital divide: Current and future research directions. Journal of the Association for information systems.
Hargittai, E. 2003. The Digital Divide and What to Do About It. New Economy Handbook. Princeton University.
Harahap, M., & Surnaherman, S. (2018). Analisis Modal Sosial (Social Capital) Kelompok Tani Dalam Meningkatkan Produktivitas Petani (Studi Kasus Petani Sayur Kelurahan Tanah Enam Ratus Kecamatan Medan Marelan). Kumpulan Penelitian dan Pengabdian Dosen.
Hayati, A., & Yuswadi, H. 2019. Pola Hubungan Ketetanggaan di Masyarakat Urban: Studi Kasus di Kampung Osing, Jember.
Hoel, Arne. 2013. Urban Agriculture: findings from four city case studies. diakses Tanggal 30 November 2021 dari documents.worldbank.org: https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/434431468331834592/urban-agriculture-findings-from-four-city-case-studies
Krefting, Laura. 1991. Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Latifah, N., Handayani, P. K., & Muzid, S. 2019. Perluasan Pangsa Pasar dan Peningkatan Pendapatan Mina Collection kudus Melalui Online Marketing. Muria Jurnal Layanan Masyarakat.
Monsher, A. T. 1987. Menggerakkan dan Mengembangkan Pertanian. Yusaguna. Jakarta.
Moleong, Lexy J. 2007. Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda.
Nasrullah, Rulli. (2016). Media Sosial: Perspektif Komunikasi, Budaya, dan Sosioteknologi. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media.
Neuman, W.L. and Robson, K., 2014. Basics of social research. Toronto: Pearson Canada.
Ula, M., & Amiin, M. K. 2014. Sustainable Agriculture-System (Sac-s): Inovasi Konsep Pertanian Urban Sebagai Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Dan Upaya Penanganan Masalah Perkotaan. In Pekan Ilmiah Mahasiswa Nasional Program Kreativitas Mahasiswa-Gagasan Tertulis 2014. Indonesian Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education.
Lawang, R. M. Z. 2004. Kapital Sosial dalam Perspektif Sosiologik suatu Pengantar. FISIP UI Press. Jakarta.
Lestari, E., & Sembiring, B. 2018. Pengaruh Profesionalisme Guru Terhadap Semangat Kerja Guru di SMA PGRI 2 Kota Jambi. SJEE: Scientific Journals of Economic Education.
Putnam, RD. 1996. The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life. TheAmerican Pros pect.
Ragnedda, M. and Ruiu, M.L., 2020. Digital capital: A Bourdieusian perspective on the digital divide. Emerald Group Publishing.
Rosyadi, K. 2018. New Social Capital Dan Revolusi Industri 4.0; Studi Terhadap Pembangunan Masyarakat Umkm Batik Tanjung Bumi Bangkalan Madura. Pamator Journal.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v22i2.2456
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
|



