Penentuan Utang yang Telah Jatuh Waktu pada Click-Wrap Agreement yang Tidak Mencantumkan Klausul Jatuh Waktu Utang
Abstract
Bankcruptcy and Suspension of Payment law is a great solution for debitor who have debt problems with their creditors. Debtors can be declared bankrupt or Suspension of Payment if the debtor is simply proven to have debts to 2 (two) or more creditors and is simply proven to have "a debts that has become due and payableâ€. The existence of "a debts that has become due and payable†is one of the fundamental things in bankruptcy or Suspension of Payment cases. In today's world, determining the existence of “a debts that has become due and payable†becomes difficult. The many new forms of agreements and clauses in the world of business law make new difficulties in proving the existence of “a debts that has become due and payable†in bankruptcy and Suspension of Payment cases. These difficulties can be found in the click-wrap agreement. Click-wrap agreement is an electronic agreement that uses standard clauses. The unilateral determination of clauses in click-wrap agreements often creates problems in practice. One of the problems that occur is a dispute about the determination of a debts that has become due and payable that comes from the click-wrap agreement between the debtor and the creditor. This is because click-wrap agreement makers often don't specify a debt maturity date in the agreement. Based on the explanation above, this research will examine and analyze the determination of the existence of "a debts that has become due and payable" from click-wrap agreements that do not regulate the debt maturity clause.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Fakhriah, Efa Laela. 2017. Pembuktian sederhana Dalam Perkara Kepailitan di Pengadilan Niaga. Bandung: Corleone Books.
Ginting, Elyta Ras. 2018, Hukum Kepailitan: Teori Kepailitan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Muljadi, Kartini & Gunawan Widjaja. 2003. Pedoman Menangani Perkara Kepailitan. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.
Santoso, Edy. 2018. Pengaruh Era Globalisasi Terhadap Hukum Bisnis di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.
Satrio, J. 1993. Hukum Perikatan: Perikatan Pada Umumnya. Bandung: Alumni.
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. 2018. Sejarah, Asas, dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan: Memahami Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Jakarta: Prenadamedia.
Soekanto, Soerjono. 2005. Pengantar Penulisan Hukum. Jakarta: UI-Press.
Subhan, M. Hadi. 2008. Hukum Kepailitan: Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Sumardjono, Maria S.W. 1989. Pedoman Pembuatan Usulan Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum UGM.
Suyatno, R. Anton. 2012. Pemanfaatan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Sebagai Upaya Mencegah Kepailitan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Meida Group.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v22i3.2621
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
|