Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Siswa Menggunakan Modul Elektronik dengan Modul Konvensional Melalui Model Guided Discovery Learning pada Materi Senyawa Hidrokarbon
Abstract
This research is a quasi-experimental research. This study was conducted to reveal how the students' learning outcomes on hydrocarbon compounds were compared when using an electronic module with a conventional module with a guided discovery learning model in class XI of SMAN 3 Pariaman. This study used a two-group pretest-posttest design with 66 students in class XI MIPA 1 and XI MIPA 2 at SMAN 3 Pariaman for the academic year 2022/2023. Class XI MIPA 1 is used as experimental class 1 using electronic module teaching materials, while class XI MIPA 2 is used as experimental class 2 using conventional module teaching materials. The data obtained from student learning outcomes in the experimental class 1 is 80.3030 and in the experimental class 2 is 71.8181. From hypothesis testing with a significance level of 0.05, it was obtained tcount < ttable (1.59 < 2.04). So in this study H1 was accepted. Thus, there is a significant difference in learning outcomes between classes using electronic modules with guided discovery learning models and classes using conventional modules with guided discovery learning models on hydrocarbon compounds in class XI IPA SMAN 3 Pariaman in the 2022/2023 academic year.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aprianti, R., Desnita, & Budi, E. 2015. Pengembangan Modul Berbasis Contextual Teaching and Learning (Ctl) Dilengkapi Dengan Media Audio- Visual Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Fisika Peserta Didik Sma. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (E-Journal) SNF 2015, IV, 137–142.
Asrizal, A., Hendri, A., & Festiyed, F. 2019. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Penemuan Mengintegrasikan Laboratorium Virtual dan Hots untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Pembelajaran Siswa SMA Kelas XI. Prosiding Seminar Hibah Program Penugasan Dosen Ke Sekolah (PDS), November, 49–57.
Hakim, L. 2017. Analisis Perbedaan Kurikulum KTSP dengan Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Ilmiah Didaktika, 17(1), 280–292.
Mayer, R. E. 2004. Should There Be a Three-Strikes Rule against Pure Discovery Learning? The Case for Guided Methods of Instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19.
Ningsih, S. 2014. Perbedaan Penggunaan Modul Dan Tanpa Modul Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Kas Kecil Kelas Xi Ak Smk Negeri 10 Surabaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi (JPAK), 2(2), 1–10.
Pendidikan, M., Kebudayaan, D. A. N., & Indonesia, R. 2014. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 103 Tahun 2014.
Purwanto, C.E. Sunyoto E.N., dan W. 2012. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Guided Discovery Pada Materi Pemantulan Cahaya Untuk Meningkatkan Berpikir Kritis. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 1(1).
Ramadhanty, N., Desnita, Asrizal, & Darvina., Y. 2020. Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Siswa Menggunakan E-Modul Berbasis Ctl Dengan Buku Teks Fisika Pada Materi Hukum Newton Gravitasi Dan Usaha Energi Kelas X Sman 2 Padang. Physics Education, 13(3), 419–426.
Rumansyah, M. 2016. Perbedaan pengaruh pembelajaran dengan menggunakan modul interaktif dan modul konvensional terhadap pemahaman konsep IPA. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 4(1), 54–62.
Trianto. 2009. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif. Jakarta : Kencana
Yerimadesi. 2018. Pengembangan Model Guided Discovery Learning (GDL) Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Kimia Di SMA. Disertasi. Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Padang.
Zain, H. 2015. Karakteristik Kurikulum 2013 Dan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (Ktsp). El-Idare: Journal of Islamic Education Management, 1(01), 15–31.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v23i1.3074
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
|



