Kesepakatan Wanprestasi dan Pernyataan Sukarela dalam Putusan MK No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 terhadap Kekuatan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia

Deni Hendri Kurniawan, Siti Malikhatun Badriyah

Abstract


The aim of this research is to find out practical steps to determine the default agreement and voluntary statement in Constitutional Court Decision No.18/PUU-XVII/2019 regarding the executorial power of fiduciary guarantees. This type of research is normative legal with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Research data was found by means of library research studying primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The results of this research indicate that financing companies in carrying out their business activities using credit distribution mechanisms are required to enter into financing agreements with articles of default (stipulations for debtors in default); This means that the finance company as the creditor must include a default article with content material that is required by POJK 35/2018 and in determining whether the customer is in default, they must be given a warning letter with information that all guarantees legal certainty or is in accordance with the existing default agreement; and the form of a voluntary statement to create legal certainty as intended by Constitutional Court Decision No.18/PUU-XVII/2019 is that apart from the voluntary clause contained in the contents of the financing agreement, it can be made with a special statement letter stating that you voluntarily hand over fiduciary guarantees when a default has occurred. previously agreed.


Keywords


fiduciary guarantee, voluntary, default.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdulkadir Muhammad. 2000. Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Depri Liber Sonata. 2012. Permasalahan Pelaksanaan Lelang Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan dalam Perkara Perdata dalam Praktik. Lampung: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Fiat Justicia, 6(2).

Fuady, Munir. 2003. Jaminan Fidusia, Cetakan kedua Revisi. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Karelina., Natalia. 2022. Implikasi Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU/XVII/2019 dan Penegasannya dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2/PUU-XIX/2021 terhadap Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia dan Perumusan Klausula Perjanjian. Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 5(20).

Mahkamah Konstitusi. 2019. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019

OJK. 2022. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan 7/POJK.05/2022 tentang Perubahan atas POJK 35/POJK.05/2018 tentang Penyelenggaraan Usaha Perusahaan Pembiayaan

OJK. 2023. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 22 Tahun 2023 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen

Satrio., J. 2020. Hukum Jaminan Hak Jaminan Kebendaan Fidusia. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Subekti., R dan Tjitrosudibio., R, 2016. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijke Wetbok). Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia

Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 tentang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan.

Witanto, D. Y. 2015. Hukum Jaminan Fidusia dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v24i2.5259

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ADRESS JOURNAL

JURNAL ILMIAH UNIVERSITAS BATANGHARI JAMBI (JIUBJ)
Published by Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat
Adress: Jl.Slamet Ryadi, Broni-Jambi, Kec.Telanaipura, Kodepos: 36122, email: jiubj.unbari@gmail.com, Phone: 0741-670700

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.