Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran IPA Melalui Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Instruction (PBI) dengan Media Kartu Pintar pada Siswa Kelas III SD Negeri 64/IV Kota Jambi Semester Genap Tahun Pelajaran 2017/2018
Abstract
Background problems in science learning, teachers do not involve students in investigations, students are less trained in developing work (products). The concepts mastered by students are only given by rote by the teacher, students are not taught through a process of discovery that is problem-oriented in everyday life. Based on these problems, the most appropriate solution is to implement the PBI model with smart card media. The general problem formulation is how to improve the quality of science learning in class III 64 / IV SD Negeri Jambi. Whereas specifically is whether through the Problem Based Instruction learning model with smart card media can improve teacher skills, student activities, and student learning outcomes in class III science learning at SD Negeri 64 / IV Jambi City. The general objective of this study was to improve the quality of science learning in third grade students of SD Neegri 64 / IV Jambi City. Specifically, it is to improve teacher skills, student activity, and learning outcomes in class III 64th Natural Science learning. This type of research is classroom action research, using the Problem Based Instruction model with smart card media that is applied in three cycles. Each cycle consists of two cycles with four meetings and four stages, namely planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. Subjects of the study were third grade students of SD Neegri 64 / IV Jambi City even semester 2017/2018. Data collection techniques used tests to measure learning outcomes and student activities using instruments, and observation formats for teacher management in classroom learning. The results of the study showed that for the management of learning in the classroom in cycle 1 was a score of 32, cycle 2 received a score of 38 and cycle 3 obtained a score of 48 with good criteria. The results of the study The activities of students obtain an average score of two meetings in cycle 1 is 25.85 with sufficient criteria; The cycle obtained a score of 45 with good criteria. In cycle 3, the score obtained was 34.25 in the good category. While for student learning outcomes the average percentage of classical completeness from the two meetings in cycle 1 was 56.41%. Cycle 2 obtained the percentage of classical completeness was 64%. In cycle 3, the percentage of classical completeness was 82%. The results of this study have shown that the indicators of success have been achieved so that this study was declared successful. As for the conclusions of this study, through the Problem Based Instruction (PBI) model with smart card media can improve teacher learning management, student activities and learning outcomes of class III SD Neegri 64 / IV Jambi City at even semester 2017/2018 school year.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anni, Catharina Tri, dkk. 2006. Motivasi Belajar. Semarang: UPT UNNES
Aqib, Zainal, dkk. 2011. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Untuk Guru SD,SLB, TK. Bandung: CV. Yrama Widya
Arends, I. Richard.2008. Learning To Teach (Belajar untuk Mengajar). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta
. 2008. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Arsyad, Azhar. 2011. Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada Badan Standar Satuan Pendidikan
(BSNP). 2007. Standar Proses. Jakarta: Badan Standar Satuan Pendidikan.
Cakudik. 2012. Revisi Taksonomi Bloom.
Depdiknas. 2004. Kualitas Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
. 2007. Kajian Kebijakan Kurikulum Mata Pelajaran IPA. Jakarta : Pusat Kurikulum Balitbang Depdiknas.
Fatthurrohman, Pupuh, Sobry Sutikno. 2001. Strategi Belajar Mengajar Melalui Penanaman Konsep Umum dan Konsep Islami. Bandung: CV Maulana
Gunanto, Muhammad Okto. 2012. Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran IPA Melalui Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Instrction pada Kelas IVB SD Negeri Tambakaji 01 Semarang. Skripsi: UNNES
Hakim, Luqman. 2012. Jurnal Pendidikan dengan Model Problem Based Instruction. Tersedia pada : [online]
http://journal.uns.ac.id/index.php/diunduhpada 28 Februari 2013 pukul 09.01
Hamalik, Oemar. 2008. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
Hamdani. 2011. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia
Herrhyanto, Nar dan H.M. Akib Hamid. 2007. Statistika Dasar. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka
Indriana, Dina. 2011. Ragam Alat Bantu Media Pengajaran. Jogjakarta: DIVA Press
Iwan.2012. Media Kartu Pintar. Tersedia pada: [online] http://iwansmtri.blogspot.com/2012/09/belajar-matematika-dengan-kartu-kemudi.html. diunduh pada 1 Februari 2013 pukul 10.11
Wardani, I.G.A.K. 2008.Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Khoi.2009. Berbagai Kriteria Guru Efektif. Tersedia pada: [online] http://khoi82.wordpress.com. diunduh pada 28 Mei 2013 pukul 09.03
Lapono, Nabisi, dkk. 2008. Belajar Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Depdiknas
Labolatorium Pengembangan Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Islam (LP3I). 2010.
Keterampilan Dasar Mengajar. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media
Nasution, Noehi, dkk.1999. Pendidikan IPA di SD. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka Poerwanti, Endang. 2008. Asesmen Pembelajaran.Jakata: Depdiknas
Permendiknas. 2007. Standar Proses Untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Tersedia pada: [online] akhmadsudrajat.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/standar-proses-_permen-41- 2007_.pdf PERMENDIKNAS NO 41 TAHUN 2007 diunduh pada 2 Juli 2013 pukul 13.41
Redaksi. 2012. Kartu Pintar Pada Pembelajaran IPA. Tersedia pada: [online] KORANPENDIDIKAN.com diunduh pada 6 Juli 2013 pukul 07.07
Rifa‟i, Achmad, Catharina Tri Anni. 2009. Psikologi Pendidikan. Semarang: UPT UNNES Press
Rusman. 2012. Model-Model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: PT Grafindo Persada
Santoso, Eko. Budi. 2011. Kelemahan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Instruction. Tersedia pada : [online] http://ras-
eko.blogspot.com/favicon.ico diunduh 30 Desember 2012 pukul 12.37 Sardiman. 2012. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
Slavin, Robert. E. 1994. Educational Psycholog Theory and Practise.Massachuettes United States of America: A Division of Paramount Publishing.
Sudjana, Nana. 1989. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar.Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
Suharti, Eny. 2012. Kartu Pintar.
Sukmadinata. 2009. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
Suprijono, Agus. 2009. Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Sutama. 2011. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Kuantatif, Kualitatif, PTK, R&D.
Surakarta: Fairuz Media
Sutrisno, Leo, dkk. 2007.Pengembangan Pembelajaran IPA SD. Jakarta: Depdiknas
Trianto. 2010. Model Pembelajaran Terpadu. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara Undang-Undang Permendiknas No 22 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Isi.
Wahyudin. 2008. Pengantar Pendidikan. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka. Warpala, Sukra I Wayan. 2012. Teori Vygotsky.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v19i2.652
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
|