Kedudukan Hukum Surat Peringatan (SP) dan Skorsing dalam Proses PHK Buruh/Pekerja

Dede Agus

Abstract


Warning letter (SP) is an effort to avoid layoffs (PHK), because warning letter does not decide an employment relationship immediately. Sometimes, an employer ignore warning letter in practice and they give skorsing letter directly. Although the warning letter and skorsing have a different law status. Therefore, this paper is aimed to discuss warning letter and skorsing law status in labour/an employee layoffs process. Warning letter and skorsing were given labour/an employee by employer before layoffs, but warning letter and skorsing have a difference of principle. Warning letter educate labour/an employee to take responsibility and still not yet layoffs process, but skorsing is given labour/an employee by employer in layoffs process. It propose and wait layoffs decision from institutions of industrial relations disputes settlement.


Keywords


warning letter; law status; skorsing; labour/employee layoffs

Full Text:

PDF

References


Farianto, Willy. Problem Hukum Upah Proses Pasca Putusan MK, http://www.hukum.online.com, Selasa, 04 Oktober 2011.

Husni, Lalu. Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial, RadjaGrafindo Persada: Jakarta, 2005.

Hutomo, Dimas. Hukumnya Mengeluarkan SP 3 Tanpa Bukti Pelanggaran, http://hukumonline.com, Jumat, 19 Juli 2019.

Jehani, Libertus. Hak-hak Pekerja Bila di PHK, VisiMedia: Jakarta, 2007.

Khakim, Abdul. Pengantar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia: Berdasarkan UU No. 13 Tahun 2003, Citra Aditya Bakti: Bandung, 2003.

Maimun. Hukum Ketenagakerjaan, Pradnya Paramita: Jakarta, 2004.

Manulang, Sendjun H. Pokok-pokok Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia, Rineka Cipta: Jakarta, 2001.

Mahendra, Futhuriyyah. Surat Peringatan (SP) Karyawan dan Ketentuannya Menurut UU, https://glints.com/id/lowongan, 27 Juli 2018.

Poerwadarminta,W.J.S. Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia, Edisi ketiga cetakan keempat, Balai Pustaka: Jakarta, 2007.

Rommalla, Syiti. Aturan Surat Peringatan Karyawan (SP) berdasarkan Undang-Undang Ketenagakerjaan, https://www.gadjian.com/blog, 16 Maret 2018.

Shubhan, M. Hadi. Bahan Kuliah Hukum Ketenagakerjaan, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga (Unair): Surabaya, 2006.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Undang-undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan.

Undang-undang No. 2 Tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No 37/PUU-IX/2011, tentang permohonan Pengujian UU No 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan terhadap UUD 1945, tanggal 19 September 2011.

Putusan No. 01/PHI.G/2006/PN.JKT.PST tentang Perselisihan PHK Buruh/Pekerja di Perusahaan Garuda Indonesia (PT. Garuda Indonesia).

Putusan No. 44/G/2006/PHI.Sby tentang Perselisihan PHK Buruh/Pekerja di PT. Yamaha Musical Products Indonesia (PT.YMP) Pasuruan.

Putusan No.18/G/2006/PHI.Serang tentang Perkara Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial di PT. Teijin Indonesia Fiber Corporation TBK (PT. TIFICO) Tangerang.

Putusan No. 08/G/2007/PHI.Serang tentang Perselisihan PHK Buruh/Pekerja di PT. Karya Cipta Putra Indonesia d/h PT. Internusa Artacipta Tangerang.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v20i2.920

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ADRESS JOURNAL

JURNAL ILMIAH UNIVERSITAS BATANGHARI JAMBI (JIUBJ)
Published by Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat
Adress: Jl.Slamet Ryadi, Broni-Jambi, Kec.Telanaipura, Kodepos: 36122, email: jiubj.unbari@gmail.com, Phone: 0741-670700

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.