Wewenang KPPU terhadap Pemberian Sanksi pada Pihak Lain Dalam Kasus Persekongkolan Tender

Nurul Fitriani

Abstract


Unfair business competition will cause losses to consumers and business parties, unhealthy business practices will also damage national economic stability, which can lead to a monetary crisis in a country. The raise of Regulation Number 5 of 1999 is an effort to prevent unfair business competition practices, especially in organizing tenders for the procurement of goods and / or services. So it is very interesting that the problem in this research is that it takes a juridical approach to cases of tender conspiracy and the authority of the KPPU in imposing sanctions on parties who commit fraudulent efforts in holding tenders, and related to the problem of the absence of sanctions for other parties, namely the committee / tender organizer or government officials and politicians. involved in tender rigging. This study uses the juridical normative research method using secondary data sources through literature studies which are analyzed qualitatively descriptive. The research found that conspiracy in the holding of tenders can occur horizontally or vertically, so that the juridical approach in this case is very suitable to be used to ensnare unhealthy business actors, the juridical approach used is the per se illegal approach. Law Number 5 of 1999 has given the authority to KPPU to impose sanctions on perpetrators of unhealthy business practices, decisions issued by KPPU are legal decisions, however KPPU has the authority to impose sanctions on business practice actors. unhealthy is only limited to administrative sanctions.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adifyan Rahmat Asga dan Ditha Wiradiputra. 2012, “Analisa Kedudukan Panitia Tender Dalam Persekongkolan Tender Secara Vertikal (Studi Kasus Putusan KPPU Nomor 04/KPPU-L/2013).” Universitas Indonesia: 2.

Dkk, Prasetijo Riyadi, 2015, 5 Langkah Mudah Menyelesaikan Skripsi & Tesis Hukum. Surabaya: Perwira Media Nusantara.

Dkk, Riski Dysas Prabawani, 2017, “Analisis Yuridis Penegakan Hukum Persengkongkolan Tender Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Praktik Larangan Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.” Privat Law V.

Kagramanto, L Budi, 2007, “Komparasi Pengaturan Tender Di Indonesia Dan Jepang Dalam Prespektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha.” Era Hukum.

Keintjem, Enrico Billy, 2016, “Tinjauan Yuridis Praktek Persekongkolan Yang Tidak Sehat Dalam Tender Proyek Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999.” Lex Administrantum 4.4.

Kristianto, Yakub Adi, 2005, “Masalah Persengkongkolan Tender Dalam Persaingan Usaha- Studi Kasus Putusan KPPU No.35/KPPU-1/2010.” Yayasan Pengembangan Hukum Bisnis Jakarta 24.4 .

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, 2015, Penelitian Hukum. Revisi. Surabaya: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Monareh, Y Budianto, 2011, “Masalah Persekongkolan Tender Dalam Persaingan Usaha- Studi Kasus Putusan KPPU No.35/KPPU-1/2010 Dalam Proyek Donggi Senoro.” Universitas Indonesia.

Sarjana, I Made, 2003, “Analisis Pendekatan Ekonomi Dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha,” no. 1 : 6–8.

Sudarsono, 1992, Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Supianto, 2013, “Pendekatan Per Se Illegal Dan Rule Of Reason Dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Rechtens 2.

Undang-Undang

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat

Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 1999 tentang Jasa Konstruksi




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v21i1.1241

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ADRESS JOURNAL

JURNAL ILMIAH UNIVERSITAS BATANGHARI JAMBI (JIUBJ)
Published by Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat
Adress: Jl.Slamet Ryadi, Broni-Jambi, Kec.Telanaipura, Kodepos: 36122, email: jiubj.unbari@gmail.com, Phone: 0741-670700

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.