Analisa Pragmatik: Deiksis dalam Putusan Perkara Pidana Korupsi
Abstract
This study analyzes the pragmatic elements used in the legal texis issued by Pengadilan Tinggi DKI Jakarta. This study aims to determine how the selection and use of deixis in corruption case decisions at the Jakarta high court. It referred to by the speaker and influenced by the meaning of the conversation. Data analysis was conducted by serving the text of the verdict on corruption cases issued at the Jakarta high court for 8 weeks. It was concluded that four types of deixis were used. They are place deixis, discourse deixis, first person, and demonstrative deixis
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Cahyono, Bambang Yudi. 1995. Kristal-Kristal Ilmu Bahasa. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.
Chazawi, Adami. 2002. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana (Stelsel Pidana, Tindak Pidana, Teori – Teori Pemidanaan & Batas Berlakunya Hukum Pidana), Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada
Kaswanti Purwo, Bambang. 1990. Pragmatik dan Pengajaran Bahasa: Menyibak Kurikulum 1984. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Levinson. 1983. Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press
Mukhtar. 2013. Metode Penelitian Deskriptif Kualitatif. Jakarta: GP Press Group
Nababan, P.W.J. 1987. Ilmu Pragmatik (Teori dan Penerapannya). Jakarta: Pengembangan Lembaga Tenaga Kependidikan
Sumarsono. 2008. Buku Ajar Pragmatik. Singaraja: Undiksha
Wijana, I. Dewa Putu. 1996. Dasar-dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v21i2.1564
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
|



